BREAKING NEWS: Golden defeats Poliquin in contested 2nd District ranked-choice count, as reported by the Bangor Daily News, November 15, 2018
The Poliquin campaign had filed suit in federal court on November 13 challenging the use of RCV in his Congressional Election. His request for a temporary restraining order to halt the RCV count was denied just a short time before the final result was announced. You can read Judge Walker's opinion denying the motion here. It's very strong.
Meanwhile, the constitutional case goes forward. Arguments will be heard in federal district court in Bangor on December 5. You can read the complaint here and the request for a preliminary injunction here. Briefs filed in opposition include those from:
Statement from LWVME on lawsuit seeking permanent injunction in CD2 RCV implementation, press release, November 13, 2018.
In the November 6 general election, we were the first state in the country to use ranked choice voting to elect these offices:
U.S. Congress District 1 and District 2
The races for U.S. Senate and U.S. Congress in District 1 were won by outright majority on the first round.
The race for U.S. Congress in District 2 went through an RCV count. Here's official information from the Secretary of State.
We DID NOT use ranked choice voting to elect these offices:
Governor of Maine
Maine State Senate
Maine State House of Representatives
District Attorney, County Commissioner and other offices
Find more information about ranked choice voting from the Maine Secretary of State
Watch this cool video that shows how RCV works.
Elections matter. Let's work together to get this right.
Elections matter; let's get to work; let's get this right.
The League has issued a set of Guiding Principles for RCV, applying core election standards to upcoming ranked choice voting elections in Maine.
Read the League's April 6 cover letter to the Secretary of State and our comments on the proposed rules for implementing RCV.
Read more about the legislative and legal background.
✓ Eliminates spoilers and strategic voting: Ranked choice voting allows voters to support their favorite candidate without worrying that they might "throw their vote away," or worse, split their votes with like‐minded voters and unintentionally help elect the candidate they like the least.
✓ Reduces negative campaigning: Candidates running in ranked choice elections must ask for second and, sometimes, third choice rankings. Voters are less likely to rank a candidate highly who is negative toward their preferred candidate.
✓ Reduces the influence of money in politics: Campaigns and special interest groups spend a lot of money on negative advertising. By making negative advertising less effective, ranked choice voting reduces the need for, and influence of, money in politics.
✓ 11 cities across the United States currently use ranked choice voting to elect city officers, including Portland, Maine. Also San Francisco, Cambridge, and Minneapolis.
✓ 5 states provide military and overseas voters with ranked choice ballots to participate in federal runoff elections.
✓ 4 countries, including Australia, Ireland, Malta, and New Zealand, use ranked choice voting in federal elections.
✓ Numerous public and private sector organizations, including the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Science, use ranked choice voting for their elections.
Read more about who uses RCV.
The League's Position on Ranked Choice Voting, also called Instant Run-off Voting
The League's 2008 - 2011 Study materials on RCV then called Instant Run-off Voting