2024
May 17 -- Constitutional Right to Vote?
Does the Constitution guarantee our right to vote? Do we need a constitutional amendment to protect that right? Some of us thought we already had that. Where are we getting it wrong? How would a Constitutional Amendment help? What are the chances of getting it? We'll hear from the experts:
- Dmitry Bam is Vice Dean/Provost, Professor of Law, at the University of Maine School of Law.
- Rick Hasen is Professor of Law and Political Science and Director of the Safeguarding Democracy Project at UCLA. He is also author of the new book, A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy.
In case is missed it, listen from the archive here.
To learn more about this topic:
- Opinion | How Do You Teach Constitutional Law With This Supreme Court? | The New York Times, Jesse Wegman (NYT Editorial Board), February 2024
- A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy, Rick Hasen, February 2024
- Opinion | The U.S. Lacks What Every Democracy Needs | New York Times, Rick Hasen, January 2024
- Does the Constitution Guarantee a Right to Vote? The Answer May Surprise You | New York Times, Michael Wines, October 2022
- The Right to Vote: Is the Amendment Game Worth the Candle? | William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Heather Gerken, October 2014
- What Does the Constitution Say About the Right to Vote? - Democracy Docket, Mac Brower, February 2022
- The Missing Right: A Constitutional Right to Vote : Democracy Journal, Jonathan Soros, Spring 2013
- What Does the Constitution Actually Say About Voting Rights? | The Atlantic, Garrett Epps, August, 2013
- The Right to Vote by Alexander Keyssar | Hachette Book Group, 2000
- Voting rights laws and constitutional amendments | USAGov
April 19 -- Clean Elections 24 Years Later. (Yes, it’s been that long.)
"... Nothing will fundamentally change until we solve the problem of money in politics." ~ Arianna Huffington
We'll talk about the Maine Clean Election Act -- public funding for candidate campaigns-- as we move through our third decade. How does our program work in Maine? What have been its benefits and disappointments? How do publicly financed elections fit into the practical landscape for campaign finance reform considering the current legal environment? What trends are we seeing in Maine and nationally?
If you missed the broadcast, you can listen from the archive here.
Special Guests:
- Anna Kellar, Executive Director, Maine Citizens for Clean Elections
- Ian Vandewalker, Special Counsel, Democracy, Brennan Center for Justice
To learn more about this topic:
- RFK Jr.’s VP Pick and the Dangers of Self-Funded Campaigns | Brennan Center for Justice, Ian Vandewalker, March 2024
- Maine considers expanding clean elections law to county candidates | Public News Service, February, 2024
- Small Donor Public Financing Explained | Brennan Center for Justice, Mariana Paez and Ian Vandewalker, June 2023
- 2023 Study Report on the MCEA | Maine Ethics Commission
- MCEA Candidate Participation 2022 | Maine Ethics Commission
- Fight Over Clean Elections Act Won’t Be Over Anytime Soon And May Have Consequences In November | Maine Public, June 2018
- What is the Maine Clean Elections Law?, MCCE video explainer and fact sheet
- Cleaning House? Assessing the Impact of Maine’s Clean Elections Act on Electoral Competitiveness | Maine Policy Review, 2012
- Maine "Clean Elections" Initiative, Question 1 (2015) - Ballotpedia
- Amplifying Small-Dollar Donors in the Citizens United Era | Common Cause
March 15 — Unions and Democracy Take Two
We’ll revisit topics from our show in 2021, talking about the historical and contemporary links between labor organizing and expanding political rights like voting. Is union organizing an important, if not essential, tool in building a vibrant democracy – of people having a voice in their self-governance? What led to the demise of unions over the last half century? What have been the political consequences? Are unions making a comeback? Why is that? What new trends are emerging here in Maine?
If you missed the broadcast, listen from the archive here.
Special guests:
- David Madland, Senior Fellow and senior adviser to the American Worker Project at the Center for American Progress
- Arthur Phillips, Economic Policy Analyst at the Maine Center for Economic Policy
- Cynthia Phinney, President of the Maine AFL-CIO. In 2015, she was the first woman elected to that position and has held the position since.
To learn more about this topic:
- Americans’ views of labor unions | Pew Research Center, February, 2024
- State worker union filing charges against Mills administration over pay gap | WGME, February, 2024
- USPS reschedules meeting on Hampden processing facility | WABI, February, 2024
- Local union president shares concerns about proposed changes to Hampden USPS facility | WABI, January, 2024
- Union membership grew last year, but only 10% of U.S. workers belong to a union | NPR, January, 2024
- Maine’s labor movement sees big shift from small unions | Portland Press Herald, December, 2023
- Maine farmworkers deserve equal rights | Bangor Daily News, Food and Medicine Op-ed, December, 2023
- UMaine System graduate-student workers win union certification | Mainebiz.biz, October, 2023
- Brief: The state of labor organizing in Maine | MECEP, September, 2023
- Why Government Unions—Unlike Trade Unions—Corrupt Democracy | TIME April, 2023
- Chipotle agrees to pay $240 K after closing a store that sought to unionize | CBS, March, 2023
- Chipotle workers in Maine file for chain’s first union election | The Hill, June, 2022
- House sustains veto of bill to allow Maine farm workers to unionize | Maine Public, January, 2022
- Re-Union by David Madland | Hardcover | Cornell University Press, 2021
- Democracy, Union Made, Phil Fishman in The American Interest, September 2007
February 16 — National Popular Vote: What do we need? And how can we get it?
We will talk about the history of the Electoral College and how it's working in the 21st century. What reforms are needed, and which are possible? What is the NPV compact, and how would it work? Is it right for Maine?
In case you missed it, here's a link to the archive.
Special guests:
- Mike Saxl, former Speaker of the Maine House of Representatives and Managing Principal of Maine Street Solutions, the leading proponent of the National Popular Vote in Maine
- Kate Shaw, Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, co-host of the Supreme Court podcast Strict Scrutiny
For more information or to learn more about this subject:
- Our View: It’s time to pick the president by national popular vote | Portland Press Herald, Editorial, January, 2024
- No thanks to national popular vote | Bangor Daily News, Matt Gagnon op-ed, January, 2024
- Arguments against national popular vote compact fall short | Bangor Daily News, Amy Fried op-ed, January, 2024
- Yarmouth representative pitches National Popular Vote plan | Spectrum News, January, 2024
- National Popular Vote | National Conference of State Legislatures, December, 2023, shows state-by-state passage
- Majority of Americans continue to favor moving away from Electoral College | Pew Research, September, 2023
- “A Mystifying and Distorting Factor”: The Electoral College and American Democracy | Michigan Law Review, Katharine Shaw, 2022
- The National Popular Vote, Explained | Brennan Center for Justice, December, 2020
- The Electoral College is flawed -- so are the alternatives: Experts | ABC News, December, 2020
- Why We Need A National Popular Vote | Robert Reich
- Supreme Court’s “faithless electors” decision validates case for the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact | Brookings, July, 2020
- More on "faithless electors" from the Law Library of Congress, and a list of state bind their electors from FairVote.
- Democracy Forum -- One Person, One Vote: The Electoral College and the National Popular Vote | Democracy Forum, June 19, 2020
- It's time to abolish the Electoral College | Brookings Institution>, 2020
- The Electoral College: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly | Democracy Forum, March, 2019
- Why the “National Popular Vote” scheme is unconstitutional | Independence Institute, February, 2019
- Popular vote better than Electoral College, Stanford scholars say | Stanford News, 2016
- Misguided “Objectivity” on N.P.V. | The New Yorker, June, 2011
January 19: Who gets to vote in Maine primaries? Change is coming ...
We’ll talk about the roll-out of semi-open primaries. Maine will be running semi-open primaries for the first time in 2024. We’ll explain to voters what to expect and what important deadlines and new procedures may pertain. And we’ll talk about how semi-open primaries might affect voter behavior and election outcomes.
In case you missed it live, you can listen from the archive here.
Special guests:
- Shenna Bellows, Maine Secretary of State.
- Jill Goldthwait, Hancock County journalist and political columnist, former Maine state senator (unenrolled).
- Laurel Harbridge-Yong, Professor of Political Science; Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research; Northwestern University.
For more information or to learn more about this subject:
- LWV Of Tennessee | League of Women Voters LWVTN sues over "Bona Fide Primary Voting Law, November, 2023
- Understanding the Partisan Divide: How Demographics and Policy Views Shape Party Coalitions | New America, February, 2023
- The Success Story Behind Maine's Adoption of Semi-Open Primaries | Independent Voter News, August, 2022
- State Primary Election Systems | National Council of State Legislators, June, 2021
- Why Do Legislators Reject ‘Half-Loaf’ Compromises? | Northwestern Institute for Policy Research, April, 2020
- Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters. Anderson, S., D. Butler, and Harbridge-Yong, Cambridge University Press, 2020
- LWVME Study Guide on Primaries, 2017-2018
- 9 media myths about independent voters, debunked | Vox, January 2016
- How Do You Like Me Now? The desirability of Political Independence, Klar S, Krupnikov Y., Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
2023
November 17: What Happened on Election Day? — And What Does It Mean?
This new episode will be pre-recorded; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We'll talk about what happened in the November 7 election. Who were the winners and losers, and what does it mean for the future?
In case you missed the show, you can listen from the archive here.
Special guests:
- Shenna Bellows, Maine Secretary of State
- Michael Shepherd, Political Editor at the Bangor Daily News
For more information or to learn more about this subject:
- The 3 biggest surprises from Maine’s 2023 elections, Mike Shepherd in the BDN
- Here are results of the biggest Maine races from Tuesday's election | BDN
- 2023 Election | Press Herald
- Vote411.org
- Maine Office of the Public Advocate on Question 3
- Questions Appearing on the November Ballot from the Secretary of State
- 2023 Citizen’s Guide to the Referendum Election PDF Word
- Political Pulse at Maine Public
- Democracy Forum 10/20/2023: Yikes - 8 Ballot Questions!
- Democracy Forum 4/21/23: Ballot Questions: Whose Initiatives Are They?
This episode was pre-recorded; no listener calls were taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
In case you missed it, listen to the show from the archive here.
We'll talk about the eight ballot question on Maine's November ballot. Some of them are citizen initiatives; some of them are constitutional amendments. What do they mean, what will they do, where did they come from, who supports and who opposes, and whose money is being spent?
Special guests:
- Will Hayward, Advocacy Program Director, League of Women Voters of Maine
- Steve Mistler, Maine Public’s chief politics and government correspondent
For more information or to learn more about this subject:
September 15 — Book Banning: The Tip of the Iceberg?
"Any book worth banning is a book worth reading." - Isaac Asimov
This new episode will be pre-recorded; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We'll talk about book banning in an historical and political perspective: tensions between First Amendment rights and rights of parental control; whether and how book bans reflect the tip of the iceberg of other coercive ambitions: controlling ideas, controlling culture, controlling people, etc. What is happening in Maine and around the country?
Listen to this show from the archive.
Special guests:
- Lindsay Decker, Science Reference Librarian at the Fogler Library at the University of Maine, Orono. Lindsay is also an active member of the Maine Library Association's Intellectual Freedom Committee (IFC).
- Kasey Meehan, Program Director, Freedom to Read, PEN America
- Jason Stanley, Jacob Urowsky Prof of Philosophy, Yale University
For more information or to learn more about this subject:
- Banned Books Week (October 1 - 7, 2023) | ALA
- LIVE from NYPL and The Atlantic | Banned: Censorship and Free Expression in America, October 5 registration link
- Let America Read initiative from PEN America. Text “READ” to 26797 for more information and to register to vote.
- Books Unbanned | The Seattle Public Library (spl.org) and Books Unbanned | Brooklyn Public Library (bklynlibrary.org)
- Intellectual Freedom - Maine State Library
- Florida schools got hundreds of book complaints — mostly from 2 people, August, 2023
- Twenty-two challenges to school library books have been filed in Maine since January 2022. Just one book has been removed. | Maine Monitor, August, 2023
- The Book Banners on the Left - by Cathy Young | The Bulwark, August, 2023
- Inside Moms for Liberty’s summit: Big money and money even bigger conspiracy theories | Media Matters for America, July 2023
- You can't tell the truth about the Holocaust in Poland. Could that happen in the US? | USA Today, July, 2023
- How book-banning campaigns have changed the lives and education of librarians – they now need to learn how to plan for safety and legally protect themselves | The Conversation, July. 2023
- How To Curate Age-Inappropriate Library Books Consistently With the First Amendment | The Heritage Foundation, July, 2023
- HISD to eliminate librarians, turn some libraries into discipline centers at 28 campuses | KPRC 2 News, July, 2023
- An Orono librarian is pushing back against censorship with a banned book club for students | BDN, June, 2023
- Hermon’s school board candidates offer opposing views of library book controversy | BDN, June, 2023
- ALA 2023: Behind the Book Bans | publishersweekly.com, Emily Knox interviewed, June, 2023
- Revealed: Christian legal non-profit funds US anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-abortion organizations | The Guardian, June, 2023
- The history of book bans—and their changing targets—in the U.S. | National Geographic, April, 2023
- Banning ideas and authors is not a ‘culture war’ – it’s fascism | Jason Stanley | The Guardian, February, 2023
- Our View: Culture warriors want to take down public education, June, 2022
June 16 — Public Opinion Polling: Is It Good for Democracy
"Public opinion polls are rather like children in a garden, digging things up all the time to see how they're growing." - JB Priestly
This new episode was pre-recorded; no listener calls were taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We'll talk about whether modern polling techniques have been good for democracy. Is polling a reflection of public opinion; is it shaping public opinion; or is it distorting public opinion? Who is it helping? And how can we be responsible consumers of polling information?
In case you missed it, listen to the show here.
Special guests:
- Ashley Koning, Assistant Research Professor and Director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at the Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
- Dan Shea, Chair and Professor of Government at Colby College. With Nick Jacobs, he is co-author of the new book, The Rural Voter: The Politics of Place and the Disuniting of America, due out in November from Columbia University Press.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Two Schools of Polling Are Converging: Reflecting on a Tumultuous Decade | The New York Times, May, 2023
-
How Public Polling Has Changed in the 21st Century | Pew Research Center Methods, April, 2023
-
Polls’ Representative Samples Often Merit Skepticism | WSJ, April, 2023
-
The Polls Were Historically Accurate In 2022 | FiveThirtyEight, March, 2023
-
Some midterm polls were on-target – but finding which pollsters and poll aggregators to believe can be challenging | The Conversation, November, 2022
-
Seven Ways to Evaluate a Poll | FiveThirtyEight, August, 2021
-
Harvard experts weigh the good and bad of political predictions | The Harvard Gazette, November, 2020
-
The Problems Inherent in Political Polling | The New Yorker, March, 2020
-
Can We Trust the Presidential-Election Polls? | The New Yorker, March 2020
-
How to Use Statistics to Understand Poll Results | Scientific American, October, 2016
-
Politics and the New Machine | The New Yorker, November, 2015
-
How political polling shapes public opinion - BBC News, February, 2015
-
Quiz: Test your polling knowledge - Pew Research Center Methods
"Activism is my rent for living on the planet." - Alice Walker
This new episode will be pre-recorded; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We'll talk about how young people are engaging politically nationwide and here in Maine. What motivates them? What challenges do they face? What can the larger community do to support their efforts? Why is it important to the future of democracy?
Special Guests:
-
Cole Cochrane, co-founder, Maine Youth Action
-
Mahnoor Hussain, Program Manager, CIRCLE
-
Anna Siegel, founding member of Maine Youth Climate Justice and co-founder of Maine Youth Action
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
The teen brain: Mysteries and misconceptions | Knowable, April 2023
-
24 Ways to Grow Voters Before 2024 | CIRCLE, April 2023
-
The Youth Vote in 2022 | CIRCLE, April 2023
-
LWVME Youth Voting Age Study Info Session, April, 2023
-
How the Youth Vote Is Being Suppressed - Long Story Short | The Daily Show - YouTube, March, 2023
-
Making our ‘civic deserts’ more fertile - Island Institute, April, 2023
-
GOP lawyer Cleta Mitchell decries ease of ‘campus voting’ in private RNC pitch - The Washington Post, April, 2023
-
Will the Youth Vote Decide the 2024 Presidential Election? - Brown Political Review, December, 2022
-
Suppressing the Youth Vote - LA Progressive, November, 2022
-
Gen Z on voting: 'We're the wrong generation to piss off', October, 2022
-
Does the Underrepresentation of Young People in Political Institutions Matter for Social Spending?, September, 2022
-
Supporting Young People on their Path to Running for Office, September, 2022
-
Maine Voices: Maine Generation Authority needed to meet state climate, energy goals - Portland Press Herald, Anna Siegel, April, 2022
-
A Baby Boomer and a Gen Zer Walk into a Climate Action Meeting, Anna Siegel and John Hagan, January, 2022
-
Bad Idea: Prioritizing STEM Education at the Expense of Civic Education | Defense360, December, 2020
-
Growing Voters: 18 Ways Youth Under 18 Can Contribute to Elections, January, 2020
April 21 — Ballot Questions: Whose Initiatives Are They?
"The people resort to the initiative petition [...] only because they feel their voice isn't being heard," LWV Missouri President Marilyn McCleod, testifying before the Missouri House Elections and Elected Officials Committee, January 24, 2023
This new episode will be pre-recorded on April 6; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We'll talk about the citizen initiative process in Maine: the sheer number of initiatives, the money behind them, their strengths and shortcomings, home-grown vs. "from away." How does the initiative process work, and how is it working for Maine? Can ordinary citizens still run a ballot question?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to the archive here.
Special Guests:
- Shenna Bellows, Maine Secretary of State
- Todd Donovan, Professor of Political Science, Western Washington University
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Iconic Maine diner facing backlash after ad against consumer utility | Bangor Daily News, March, 2023
- Fate of ballot initiative hangs in balance with Thursday deadline | newsbreak.com, March, 2023
- Council to consider changes to Portland referendum process | Portland Press Herald, March 2023
- As Abortion Measures Loom, GOP Raises New Barriers to Ballot Initiatives | The Pew Charitable Trusts, February, 2023
- Missouri House Passes Bill Making It Harder for Voters To Amend State Constitution - Democracy Docket, February, 2023
- House Votes to Gut Citizen Initiative Petition | MyLO, January, 2023
- Policy Matters: Ballot initiatives - Press Herald, November 17,2022
- League Study On Maine's Citizens' Initiatives And People's Veto Referenda, Fall, 2020
- Initiatives without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy’s Secondary Effects, Joshua J. Dyck & Edward L. Lascher, Jr., Jr., 2019
- Democracy Forum – Citizen Initiatives: The Devil’s in the Details, April 19, 2019
- Ballot Initiatives and Status Quo Bias | State Politics and Policy Quarterly, Joshua J. Dyck and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, 2019.
- Democracy Forum 2017 Archive | League of Women Voters, Ballot Questions in Maine: Whose Initiatives Are They?
- Statewide Ballot Measures Database | NCSL
- Initiative and Referendum Overview and Resources | NCSL
- Ballot Initiative Strategy Center
- Initiative & Referendum Institute<
- Ballot initiative | Ballotpedia
- How do initiatives work? | Ballotpedia
- Citizen Initiatives & Peoples Veto | Maine Secretary of State
- Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States, Todd Donovan and Shaun Bowler, 1998
March 17 — If Small States Rule, Why Are They So Angry?
"Politics is not merely a clash of interests, but a clash of dreams." David Brooks
This new episode will be pre-recorded on March 14; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We did our February show on small-state bias in the federal government. For March, we're asking a follow-up question: Does this small-state bias equate to overrepresentation of rural interests? Does it translate to policies that help rural areas thrive? Are communities in small or rural states actually thriving? Do people in those communities feel like they're thriving? Does "rural resentment" account for minority rule at the federal level?
Senators from small states hold outsize sway in government to the point where they can block measures that the majority of Americans want. How are they using that power? What does it mean for Maine?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to the archive here.
Special Guests:
- Amy Fried, John Mitchell Nickerson Professor or Political Science, UMaine
- Michael Podhorzer, Chairman of the Board of the Analyst Institute; Assistant to the President for Strategic Research at the AFL-CIO
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Paul Ryan Says Even MAGA Diehards Believe Trump Can’t Win in 2024 - The New York Times, March, 2023
- Most Rural States 2023 | World Population Review
- The Resentment Fueling the Republican Party Is Not Coming From the Suburbs - The New York Times, January, 2023
- Rural Americans aren't included in inflation figures – and for them, the cost of living may be rising faster | The Conversation, January, 2023
- Opinion | Can Anything Be Done to Assuage Rural Rage? | The New York Times, January 2023
- Opinion | How to fix American democracy during a ‘Great Pulling Apart’ - The Washington Post, January, 2023
- Opinion | This Is How Red States Silence Blue Cities. And Democracy |The New York Times<, January, 2023
- A Policy Renaissance Is Needed for Rural America to Thrive - The New York Times, December, 2022
- America Is Growing Apart, Possibly for Good - The Atlantic, June 2022
- Place-Based Resentment in Contemporary U.S. Elections: The Individual Sources of America’s Urban-Rural Divide, Nicholas Jacobs, B. Kal Munis, September, 2022
- At War with Government | Columbia University Press, Amy Fried and Douglas B. Harris, 2021
- How Educational Differences Are Widening America’s Political Rift - The New York Times, September, 2021
- The Electoral College and the Rural-Urban Divide - The Aspen Institute, February, 2021
- James P. Melcher and Amy Fried, "Two Maines in a (Potentially) New Swing State". Chapter 14 in David A. Schultz and Rafael Jacob (editors), Presidential Swing States, Second Edition, 2018.
- Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics | Cambridge University Press, David Hopkins, 2017
- The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker| University of Chicago Press, Kathy Cramer, 2016
- Strangers in Their Own Land | The New Press, Arlie Russell Hochschild, 2016
February 17 — Small-state Bias in the Federal Government: Is This Democracy?
This new episode was pre-recorded on February 15; no listener calls were taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"Today the voting power of a citizen in Wyoming, the smallest state in terms of population, is about 67 times that of a citizen in the largest state of California, and the disparities among the states are only increasing." -- Eric Orts, law professor
This month we'll have a conversation about the ways in which rural states are over-represented in the federal government, from the U.S. Senate to the Electoral College, the Supreme Court, and possibly even the U.S. House. How has this come about; and where is it heading? How far can it go? What can or should be done about it? How does this affect Maine?
In case you missed it live, here's a link to the archive for this show.
Special Guests:
- Mark Brewer, Professor and Interim Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Alexander Keyssar, Matthew W. Stirling Jr. Professor of History and Social Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His book, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College, is now out in paperback.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- U.S. Senate: Origins and Foundations | Senate.gov
- The Senate: From White Supremacy to Governmental Gridlock - UVA Press
- The Senate: Threat or Backbone of American Democracy? | Divided We Fall, June, 2021
- The Electoral College and the Rural-Urban Divide - The Aspen Institute, February, 2021
- Two Senators per State: A Recipe for Minority Domination | Second Rate Democracy<, 2020
- The history of the Electoral College and our national conversation about race | Harvard Kennedy School, August, 2020
- Alexander Keyssar — Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? | Politics and Prose, November, 2020
- The Stubborn Survival of the Electoral College - WSJ, August 2020
- American democracy’s Senate problem, explained - Vox, December, 2019
- Here's How to Fix the Senate - The Atlantic, January, 2019
- The Founder’ monumental constitutional mistake; 2 senators from each state | NationofChange, October, 2018
- Misrepresentation in the House of Representatives | Brookings, February 2017
- The electoral college badly distorts the vote. And it’s going to get worse | The Washington Post, November, 2016
- As American as Apple Pie? The Rural Vote’s Disproportionate Slice of Power - The New York Times, November, 2016
- Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation, Lee, Oppenheimer, 1999
- When Adding New States Helped the Republicans - The Atlantic, September, 2019
January 20 — Comprehensive Planning: Why Bother?
This new episode will be pre-recorded on January 16; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up someplace else.” – Yogi Berra
This month we'll have a conversation about comprehensive planning. A number of towns in Hancock County are doing, have done, or are thinking of doing comprehensive planning. So, what is comprehensive planning, why do Maine towns do it? Why should they do it and how often? What comprises a comprehensive plan, what difference does it make in a community, why should people care?
In case you missed it, you can listen from the archive.
Special Guests:
- Susan Lessard, Bucksport Town Manager
- Noel Musson, Principal/Planner for the Musson Group, Southwest Harbor
- Evan Richert, Director of the State Planning Office under Gov. Angus King and consulting planner to the Town of Orono from 2006-2019
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Comprehensive Plans: Municipal Planning Assistance Program: Maine DACF
- Comprehensive Planning: A Manual for Maine Communities
- Land Use Planning | National Working Waterfront Network
- Comprehensive Plan | Town of Orland, December, 2022
- Priority Strategy: Increasing Physical Activity Through Community Design | CDC, December, 2022.
- The Future of the Comprehensive Plan | Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy May, 2022
- A New Era of Equity-Based Comprehensive Planning…Finally | GreenLaw, September, 2021
- If all planning is local, how are we going to save tomorrow? Ten pragmatic lessons from the field | PMC, July 2021
- Land Use and Community Planning Strategies Can Promote Health Equity | The Pew Charitable Trusts, June 2021
- Hancock County towns preparing for a future with climate change and development demands | BDN, January, 2021
- Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US? | PMC, February 2020
- Sustaining Places: Best Practices for Comprehensive Plans | American Planning Association, January 2015
- Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning* | Paul Davidoff, November 1965
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company | Oyez
2022
November 18 — Election Reflections: What Just Happened Here?
This new episode was pre-recorded on November 14; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
This month, as we do each election year in November, we'll have a conversation about the election. This year, it will be less about how the parties and the candidates performed; more about how democracy performed. How did the election machinery hold up? How have our citizens embraced or rejected the legitimacy of the outcomes? Did women voters play a pivotal role in Maine or in other states? What about young voters? What does it all mean in the context of a bigger conversation about the future of western democracy?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Maya Eichorn, Maine Students Vote Fellow, Liberal Studies Student York County Community College
- Elaine Kamarck, Founding Director at the Center for Effective Public Management and Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings.
- Steve Mistler, Chief Political Correspondent and State House Bureau Chief, Maine Public
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Turnout among young voters was the second highest for a midterm in past 30 years | NPR, November 2022
- LePage’s loss leaves Maine Republicans at a crossroads - Portland Press Herald, November 2022
- Midterms pose fresh test for American democracy after two years under fire | Washington Post, November 2022
- ‘We’re watching you’: incidents of voter intimidation rise as midterm elections near | The Guardian, November 2022
- Gen Z voter turnout will show just how influential influencers really are | Washington Post, November 2022
- 5 Unfounded Claims About Voting in the Midterm Elections | New York Times, November 2022
- State courts are fielding sky-high numbers of lawsuits ahead of the midterms – including challenges to voting restrictions and to how elections are run | The Conversation, October 2022
- Republicans told to hold onto mail ballots until Election Day | BDN October, 2022
- Debate dodging: The latest threat to our democracy | The Hill, LWVUS, October 2022
- The end of the debate? Republicans draw the curtain on political theater | US politics | The Guardian, September, 2022
- Can the abortion issue save Democrats in the 2022 midterm elections? | Brookings, Elaine Kamarck, August 2022
- Where the Youth Vote Can Be Decisive in the 2022 Elections | CIRCLE, August 2022
October 21 — What's at Stake in Moore v Harper? -- Gerrymandering and More
This new episode features guest host, John Brautigam, Counsel and Senior Advisor to the League of Women Voters of Maine. It was pre-recorded on September 29; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"Moore v Harper could be one of the most consequential Supreme Court cases for our democracy. You probably haven't heard about it ..." -- Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor, on Twitter.
We'll have a conversation on Moore v. Harper. Many legal scholars say that the Supreme Court’s decision on this case and the Independent State Legislature Theory could be one of the most important election law cases for the future of federal elections. If adopted by the Court, the most extreme versions of the theory could destabilize elections. It remains to be seen if any version of this contentious theory will be adopted or if it will be rejected entirely. We'll talk about this issue and some of the potential implications of the case to be decided in the upcoming term.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Derek T. Muller, Ben V. Willie Professor in Excellence at the University of Iowa College of Law
- Eliza Sweren-Becker, counsel in the Voting Rights & Elections Program at the Brennan Center for Justice
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- There Is Absolutely Nothing to Support the 'Independent State Legislature' Theory | The Atlantic, October, 2022
- Moore v. Harper, Explained | Brennan Center for Justice, August 2022
- State Legislature Seeks Unchecked Power over Elections in Moore v. Harper | League of Women Voters, League of Women Voters blog, August 2022
- Unpacking the Left’s Disinformation Campaign about Moore v. Harper | National Review, August, 2022
- The Next Big Threat to American Democracy Is Headed to the Supreme Court | The New Republic, August 2022
- Is Democracy Constitutional? | The Atlantic, July 2022
- Richard Pildes’ on Election Law Blog, July 2022
- Derek Muller on Moore v. Harper and Independent State Legislature Doctrine | The Lawfare Podcast: July, 2022
- YouTubeThe Independent State Legislature Theory’s Radical Threat to Democracy | Brennan Center for Justice, May 2022
- A Guide to Recent Scholarship on the ‘Independent State Legislature Theory’ | Brennan Center for Justice, May 2022
- Contentious Fringe Legal Theory Could Reshape State Election Laws | Pew, March 2022
- Trump is planning a much more respectable coup next time | Slate Richard Hasen, August, 2021
September 16 — Checks and Balances: What Are They? Are They Working?
This new episode will be pre-recorded on September 12; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"In framing a government, ... the great difficulty is this: You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself." — James Madison
We'll have a conversation on how the three branches of government check each other: executive, judicial, legislative. Why did it matter to the Framers, and why does it matter to us? Of what importance is mutual and self-regard among the branches: each branch protecting its own institution and backing up the other branches? Is the public one of the checks -- with political consequences creating a limit on extremism? Does it seem to be working right now? Why or why not?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Kim Lane Scheppele, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs in the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs and the University Center for Human Values
- Andrew Rudalevige, Chair of the Department of Government and Legal Studies, Thomas Brackett Reed Professor of Government, Bowdoin College
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Post-ROE, the Supreme Court is on a collision course with Democracy | Vanity Fair August 25, 2022
- Opinion | The Supreme Court Has Too Much Power and Liberals Are to Blame - POLITICO, July 27, 2022
- Most in new poll say US government needs major reforms, complete overhaul | The Hill, July 13, 2022
- The Supreme Court’s Role in the Degradation of U.S. Democracy | CLC, July 13, 2022
- Opinion | How the Founders Intended to Check the Supreme Court’s Power - POLITICO, July 3, 2022
- How Viktor Orbán Wins | Journal of Democracy, July 2022
- Abuses of executive privilege reveal our system of checks and balances is on life support | The Hill October 24, 2021
- Executive privilege is killing checks and balances | MichaelLeppert.com October 15, 2021
- Checks and balances on war powers — Defense Priorities, April 2, 2021
- By Executive Order | Princeton University Press, April 2021
- Checks and Balances in a Trump-Era Supreme Court | Brennan Center for Justice, July 10, 2020
- Congress Has Lost Its Power Over Trump | The Atlantic, February 4, 2020
- The Unconstrained Presidency: Checks and Balances Eroded Long Before Trump | Council on Foreign Relations, August 14, 2018
- Congress’s Power over Courts: Jurisdiction Stripping and the Rule of Klein | CSR, August 9, 2018
July 15: Taxation without Representation: Should DC be a State?
This new episode will be pre-recorded on July 13; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"The residents of the District of Columbia deserve the right to (full) representation in Congress if for no other reason than simple fairness." U.S. Sen. Strom Thurmond (R), South Carolina
We'll have a conversation on statehood for the District of Columbia. What rights of self-determination do DC residents now enjoy? How are their rights now constrained? What are the obstacles to DC statehood? What is the history? What is the racial justice aspect to this issue? Against the backdrop of Maine's own struggle for statehood and the Missouri Compromise, why should Maine people care?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
-
Anne Anderson, Chair of the League of Women Voters DC Full Rights Committee
-
Chris Myers Asch, Visiting Instructor of History, Colby College, and co-author of the book, Chocolate City, A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
The Case for Statehood - DC History Center, with links to other great resources
- With Liberty and Justice for All (Except DC) | League of Women Voters, May 2022
- DC Statehood Explained | Brennan Center for Justice, March, 2022
- Republicans Used to Back DC Statehood. What Changed? - The Atlantic, David Graham, June, 2021
- The Long Fight for DC Statehood - JSTOR Daily, Livia Gershon February, 2021
- When Adding New States Helped the Republicans - The Atlantic, Heather Cox Richardson, September, 2019
- Chocolate City: A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation's Capital by Chris Myers Asch and George Derek Musgrove, 2019
- On the Road with the DC Statehood Toolkit, League of Women Voters of DC, November, 2017
- A Review of the D.C. League of Women Voters Project to Educate Sister Leagues Around the Country, League of Women Voters of DC, March, 2019
- “Statehood is Far More Difficult” The Struggle for D.C. Self-Determination, 1980–2017, George Derek Musgrove, Fall 2017
- Letter to Congressional Leaders on Constitutionality of Statehood for Washington D.C., May 2021
June 17: The Supreme Court and Democracy
This new episode will be pre-recorded on June 13; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"Not even the founding fathers would recognize the lengths that today's dead-hand "originalism" would go to in order to defend conservative preferences as though they are the only way to interpret written law." – Pete Buddegieg
This month, in line with the end of the SCOTUS term, we'll talk about the courts as protectors of democracy, judicial philosophy and constitutional interpretation, the authority and power of the court, and the peril of the court being political or even perceived as such. We might like to include ideas about court packing, expanding the courts, and waning public confidence in the Court.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law
- Maron Sorenson, Assistant Professor of Government, Dept. Government and Legal Studies, Bowdoin College
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
The Supreme Court (2020) : Throughline : NPR, September, 2021
-
The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics, Stephen Breyer, 2021
-
The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process." Samuel Issacharoff, Pamela S. Karlan, Richard H. Pildes, Nathaniel Persily. " 5th Edition, 2016.
-
Is the Supreme Court a 'Majoritarian' Institution?, Richard Pildes, December, 2010
May 20: The Demise of Local News: What Are We Losing?
“These communities that are losing local news coverage are losing something deeper. They're losing a connection to American democracy." -- Brian Stelter, Chief Media Correspondent for CNN
This month, we'll talk about local news and local democracy. What are "news deserts"? Does Maine have them? What happens in towns that have no institutional news coverage? Does it affect self-governance at the local level? Can citizen or grass-roots journalism fill the gap? Even if we have plenty of citizen journalists, do we lose cohesion without an institutional resource that provides a collective understanding?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Penelope Abernathy, visiting professor at the Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications.
- Dan MacLeod, Managing Editor, Bangor Daily News
- Lincoln Millstein, blogger, The Quietside Journal, retired media executive
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Exploiting the local news desert | Editor and Publisher, November 2021
-
Islander celebrates 20 years of community journalism - Mount Desert Islander, FaithD’Ambroise, November, 2021
-
The Last Legs of Local Journalism | Stats + Stories Episode 166, Miami University at Oxford, Ohio, December, 2020
-
The Expanding News Deserts, Penelope Aberathy, Map and definition, 2020
-
How We Know Journalism is Good for Democracy, Josh Stearns at the Democracy Fund, June 2018
-
News Deserts and Ghost Newspapers: Will Local News Survive?, Penelope Abernathy, 2020
-
News Deserts Threaten Rural Areas | News Media Alliance, February 2017
April 15. Libraries: Defenders of Democracy
“When a library is open, no matter its size or shape, democracy is open, too.” — Bill Moyers
This month, we'll talk about libraries and democracy: privacy protection, intellectual freedom and censorship, informed citizenry, supporting elections, preserving the historical record, challenges and threats, from book bans to funding, and so much more.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
- Rich Boulet, Director, Blue Hill Public Library
- Alexandra Hinrichs, Children's Author and Middle School Librarian
- Alison Macrina, Founder of the Library Freedom Project
- Jamie Ritter, Maine State Librarian
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
The National Library Week is April 3 - 9. National Library Week | Conferences & Events
- A Conversation with Dan Rather, Award-Winning Journalist & Author of What Unites Us, Las Vegas-Clark County Library District, July 2021
March 18 — Communities on Edge: Threats and Intimidation in the Public Sphere
This new episode will be pre-recorded on March 10; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
“The most important element of a free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem, is the rejection of the initiation of violence.” Ron Paul, Freedom Under Seige.
We'll talk about anger and intimidation in the public sphere, especially in local politics. Where is this coming from? What is it that puts schools and elections in the bull's eye? What measures should officials take? What can ordinary people do? Bills have been introduced in Maine to provide heightened legal protections for election officials and school officials. How effective will these be? Can we still have deliberative democracy?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
- Patti Dubois is the Waterville City Clerk and the Legislative Policy Chair for the Maine Town and City Clerks Association.
- Jordan LaBouff is Associate Professor of Psychology and Honors at the University of Maine.
- Paul Markosian is an Ellsworth business owner and member of the Ellsworth School board.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Local election officials are exhausted, under threat and thinking about quitting, Politico, March 2022
-
New critical race theory laws have teachers scared, confused and self-censoring, Washington Post, February 2022
-
Kennebunk ME rejects 1 of 2 recall petitions for RSU 21 School Board, Seacoastonline, January 2022
-
The Five Minute Fix, Washington Post, January 2022
-
The Politics of Resentment, Five Years Later - WORT 89.9 FM, December 2021
-
Dealing With an Angry Public, Planning Commissioners Journal, Winter 2020
-
Angry Americans: How political rage helps campaigns but hurts democracy, The Conversation, September 2020
February 18 — Facebook and Democracy: Can They Live Together?
This new episode will be pre-recorded on February 15; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
“There is profit to be had in hate and division.” Joel S. Elson, Austin C. Doctor, and Sam Hunter from their article in The Conversation, January 2022
We'll talk about how Facebook has transformed our political life. How has it polarized our political identities? How has it become so central to our community and political life? What threats does it pose to democracy? What did the Facebook Papers tell us? It's not just Facebook, is it? What are the possible solutions?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
-
Jessica Brandt, policy director for the Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology Initiative at the Brookings Institution and a fellow in the Foreign Policy program’s Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology
-
Judith Rosenbaum, Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Communication and Journalism, University of Maine
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Facebook Has a Superuser-Supremacy Problem - The Atlantic, February, 2022
-
Autocracy Is Winning - The Atlantic. Anne Applebaum, December 2021
-
How to fix social media? Start with independent research, Brookings, December 1, 2021
-
The internet is a battleground. Will democracies win?, Brookings, December 1, 2021
-
The Facebook Papers, explained - The Washington Post, October, 2021
-
Facebook Is an Authoritarian State - The Atlantic, September 2021
-
This explains how social media can both weaken — and strengthen democracy, Washington Post, January 2021
-
Political polarization on Facebook, Brookings, May 2015
January 21 — Educating for Democracy: How’s it Working?
This new episode was pre-recorded on January 18; no listener calls were taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"We are bound by ideals that teach us what it means to be citizens. Every child must be taught these ideals. Every citizen must uphold them.... I ask you to be citizens. Citizens, not spectators." President George W. Bush
We'll talk about the political philosophy and history of public education in America. What is the role of public education in sustaining our fragile republic? How did public education develop and evolve over time? What has been or should be the role of public education in creating a shared civic enterprise? Have we lost sight of some of these important public benefits?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
-
Doris Santoro, Professor of Education, Bowdoin College
-
Jonathan Zimmerman, the Judy and Howard Berkowitz Professor in Education, University of Pennsylvania
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Will US Education Remedy A Half-Century Of Neglecting Civics Education?, Tom Lindsay, Forbes, February 2020
-
The need for civic education in 21st-century schools, Rebecca Winthrop, Brookings, June 2020
-
History and Evolution of Public Education in the US, Center on Education Policy, The George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development, 2020
-
Have We Lost Faith in Public Education? | Perspectives on History | AHA Johann N. Neem, July 2018
-
Democracy's Schools: The Rise of Public Education in America, Johann Neem, August 2017
-
Civic Education (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), December 2007
-
Guardian of Democracy: The Civic Mission of Schools, 2003, Carnegie Foundation, et. al.
Talk radio with LWVME
Blue Hill at WERU Community Radio, 89.9 FM — Tune on the third Friday of the month, from 4:00 — 5:00 PM. Stream online at WERU.org.
Portland at WMPG Community Radio, 90.9 FM — Tune in the first Sunday of the following month at 11:30 AM. Stream online at WMPG.org.
How it began:
Beginning in 2004 and in every presidential election year between 2004 and 2016, the League of Women Voters — Downeast produced and sponsored a series of radio programs on topics in participatory democracy called the Democracy Forum. Beginning in 2017, we continued the series monthly.
In September 2018, the Democracy Forum won top honors from the Maine Association of Broadcasting for public affairs radio. The award-winning episode was from May, 2018: "Immigration: Can We Live Without It?"
Programs from the 2017 archive, 2016 archive, 2012 archive, and the 2008 archive are also available online.
2021
November 19 — Freedom of Religion, Freedom from Religion: Politics and Religion in America
This new episode was pre-recorded on November 17; no listener calls will be taken. Comments and questions may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
“There is a difference between exercising religious beliefs and imposing them on others. Our Constitution fiercely protects the former and expressly prohibits the latter.” ― Joseph Kennedy III, former Congressman from Massachusetts
We'll talk about politics and religion. What is the constitutional foundation of the separation of church and state? Is freedom of religion in the Bill of Rights? How did the doctrine emerge and develop from the prohibition on the establishment of religion? How is the interpretation and practice affecting modern politics? What is the intersection of political activism and religious groups, now and in our history?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Mark D. Brewer, Professor of Political Science and Department Chair, University of Maine
- Vincent Phillip Muñoz, Tocqueville Associate Professor of Religion & Public Life, Department of Political Science, Concurrent Associate Professor of Law, Notre Dame University.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, James Madison, presented to the Virginia General Assembly in 1785
- In U.S., Far More Support Than Oppose Separation of Church and State, Pew Research Center, October 2021
-
The Sleeper SCOTUS Case That Threatens the Separation of Church and State, The Atlantic, October 2021
-
The Evangelical Church is Breaking Apart, The Atlantic, October 2021
-
Opinion | If they’re going to keep passing religious laws, we’re going to need exemptions, Washington Post, September 2021
-
The 2020 Census of American Religion, Public Religion Research Institute, July 2021
-
How 'In God We Trust' bills are helping advance a Christian nationalist agenda, The Conversation, July 2021
-
One Nation Under God? | American Experience, PBS, May 2021
-
How Politics Replaced Religion in America, The Atlantic, April 2021
-
The Perils of Politicized Religion, Daedalus, Summer 2020
-
Ninth Annual Constitution Day Lecture - “Faith and Freedom: Hidden Lessons from the Founding Fathers” | University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, September, 2019
-
Two Concepts of Religious Liberty: The Natural Rights and Moral Autonomy Approaches to the Free Exercise of Religion, Vincent Phillip Munoz, American Political Science Review, May 2016
-
American Christianities; A History of Dominance and Diversity Catherine A. Brekus & W. Clark Gilpin Eds., December 2011.
-
History of 'In God We Trust from the Treasury Department, last updated 2011
-
Establishment Clause (Separation of Church and State) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia, 2009
-
James Madison and the Struggle for the Bills of Rights by Richard Labunski, June 2008
-
Relevant No More?: The Catholic/Protestant Divide in American Electoral Politics by Mark D. Brewer, 2003
October 15, 2021 — In Government We Trust — Or Do We?
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I’m from the government and I’m here to help.'" — Ronald Reagan, 1986
We'll talk about trust and distrust in government. What is the history of distrust in government in the US? How has it been weaponized in the last half-century? What do we lose when we have a blanket distrust in government: who loses and who gains? What motivates strategic attempts to weaken government? In what way is distrust a weapon in the arsenal of attempts to weaken or reduce government?
Special Guests:
-
Amy Fried, John Mitchell Nickerson Professor of Political Science at the University of Maine. Her most recent book is At War with Government: How Conservatives Weaponized Distrust from Goldwater to Trump with Douglas B. Harris, August 2021.
-
Steven Webster, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Indiana University. His recent book is American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics, August 2020.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
"How Republicans Stoke Anti-Government Hatred" by Luisa S. Deprez in Washington Monthly, August 27, 2021
-
"Covid vaccine resistance and the Capitol riot stem from the GOP long weaponizing distrust," by Noah Berlatsky in NBC New Think, Aug. 3, 2021
-
"Are Liberals to Blame for Our Crisis of Faith in Government?" by Louis Menand, August 9, 2021 in The New Yorker
-
At War with Government: How Conservatives Weaponized Distrust from Goldwater to Trump by Amy Fried and Douglas B. Harris, August 2021
-
"Rebuilding Trust in American Institutions" By Sonal Shah & Hollie Russon Gilman Jan. 27, 2021, Stanford Social Innovation Review
-
American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics, by Steven W. Webster. August 2020
-
"Stoking the Beast" By Jonathan Rauch in The Atlantic June 2006
-
"Key findings about Americans’ declining trust in government and each other," Pew Research Center, July 22, 2019
-
"The Republicans waged a 3-decade war on government. They got Trump." By Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann Jul 18, 2016, Vox
September 17, 2021 — The Two-party System and the Future of Our Democracy
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power." ― Dwight D. Eisenhower
We'll talk about the history and the future of the two major parties, how parties change and evolve, how/why they splinter. Are the parties too strong or too weak? Are the two major parties in this moment so polarized that the system itself is undermined? Has the modern two-party system made us ungovernable? What reforms and options might be realistic? — multi-member districts, proportional representation, ranked choice voting?
Special Guests:
-
Lee Drutman, senior fellow at New America. He is the author of Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America and winner of the 2016 American Political Science Association's Robert A. Dahl Award, given for "scholarship of the highest quality on the subject of democracy." He is also the co-host of the podcast Politics in Question, and writes for the New York Times, Vox, and FiveThirtyEight, among other outlets.
-
Sandy Maisel, Goldfarb Family Distinguished Professor of American Government (emeritus); Director of the Colby in Washington Program, 1987-1995; Director, Goldfarb Center for Public Affairs and Civic Engagement, 2003-2012. He is the author of numerous books, including Parties and Elections in America: The Electoral Process, with Mark D. Brewer, now in its ninth edition.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
"Quiz: If America Had Six Parties, Which Would You Belong To?" by Lee Drutman in the New York Times, September 8, 2021
-
“Have Democrats become a party of the left?” William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck, for Brookings, July, 2021
-
“The Decline of the GOP,” Norm Ornstein in The Atlantic, August, 2020
-
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America, by Lee Drutman, March, 2020. Watch an interview with the author at Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop - Political Reform.
-
Parties and Elections in America: The Electoral Process. by Mark D. Brewer and L.Sandy Maisel, ninth edition, 2020
-
The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns (Transforming American Politics) Mark D. Brewer and L. Sandy Maisel, fifth edition, 2018 (essay collection)
-
“This Maine Initiative Could Shake Up the Two-Party System,” by Hendrik Hertberg in The Nation, October, 2016.
-
It's Even Worse Than It Looks by Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein, April, 2016.
-
"Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: America's Love Affair with the Two-Party System," Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective, Marc Horger, July 2013.
June 18, 2021 — Protest: Good Citizenship at Work?
To protest against injustice is the foundation of all our American democracy." — Thurgood Marshall
We'll talk about whether protests are a legitimate, if not necessary, form of civic participation. Are protests good citizenship or are they civil disorder? Is protesting effective in changing public policy? What's the difference between protest and insurrection? Are nonviolent actions more effective than those that involve violence? What different forms can these actions take: demonstrations, strikes, riots, occupation, boycotts, divestment, disengagement? What are some examples where protest movements succeeded?
Special Guests:
-
Doug Allen, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Maine, author of the book, Gandhi after 9/11: Creative Nonviolence and Sustainability (Oxford 2019)
-
Erica Chenoweth, Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Kennedy School and a Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, author of the new book, Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford, 2021)
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
"What Anti-Protest Bills Reveal About The State Of U.S. Democracy," OnPoint, WBUR, April, 2021
-
Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know, Erica Chenoweth, March, 2021
-
"The Myth of the Silent Majority: Americans have learned the wrong lessons about the political consequences of protest," Daniel Gillian, The Atlantic, September, 2020.
-
"Protesting is as important as voting," Andre M. Perry and Carl Romer, Brookings,
-
The Future of Nonviolent Resistance," Erica Chenoweth, Journal of Democracy, July, 2020.
-
"Why protests matter in American democracy," Daniel Gillion, Princeton University Press, June, 2020
-
Gandhi after 9/11: Creative Nonviolence and Sustainability, Douglas Allen, April, 2019
-
Dictators and Democrats: Masses, Elites, and Regime Change, Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman, Spetember, 2016
- Backfire Manual: Tactics against Injustice, Brian Martin, 2012.
May 21, 2021 — Democracy and Unions: Do They Need Each Other?
Organizing around a common interest is a fundamental part of democracy. We should no more try to take away the right of individuals to collectively bargain than we should try to take away the right to a secret ballot." —Michael Bloomberg
We’ll talk about the historical and contemporary link between labor organizing and expanding political rights like voting. Is union organizing an important, if not essential, tool in building a vibrant democracy? Has the diminution of labor unions contributed to the politics of resentment? Has it provided fertile ground for the current moment of populist anger and stridently divided politics? What led to the demise of unions over the last half century? How could they come back?
Special Guests:
-
David Madland, a senior fellow and the senior adviser to the American Worker Project at American Progress, author of the new book, Re-Union: How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States
-
Cynthia Phinney, President of Maine AFL-CIO since 2015.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
In 2020, the number of unionized workers dropped, while the share of union members increased, USAFacts, January, 2021
-
Democracy Dies When Labor Unions Do, Eric Levitz in New York, September, 2019
-
Democracy Needs Unions, Christine Owens at Other Words, August 28, 2019
-
The Conservative Case for Unions, Jonathan Rauch in The Atlantic, July/August 2017
-
Democracy, Union Made, Phil Fishman in The American Interest, September 2007
-
Unions and democracy go together, op-ed by David Madland and Ann Luther in the Lewiston Sun Journal, July, 2021.
April 16, 2021 — Divided We Stand: Can diversity be our strength?
We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools." — Martin Luther King, Jr., in a speech to a mixed-race audience at St. Louis University in 1964. St. Louis University is the oldest university west of the Mississippi. In 1944, as a Jesuit institution, it opened its doors to black students.
We’ll talk about whether this is one of the most divided moments in American history. How have these fractured moments come up in our prior history? What role is the emergence of multiracial democracy playing in this current divisive moment? What role has race played in the divisions of the past? Can a polity come back from such serious fragmentation? How have we gotten past it before, or have we?
Special Guests:
-
David Blight, Sterling Professor of History, of African American Studies, and of American Studies at Yale University, and Pulitzer Prize winning author of Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom.
-
Cheryl Townsend Gilkes, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Professor of Sociology and African-American Studies at Colby College.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
“Three Great Revolutions: W. E. B. Du Bois, African American Women and Social Change,” Cheryl Gilkes in the Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 2016.
-
"America is exceptional in the nature of its political divide," Pew Research Center, November, 2020.
-
"How can America heal from the Trump era? Lessons from Germany’s transformation into a prosperous democracy after Nazi rule," Sylvia Taschka in The Conversation, January, 2021.
-
"Appomattox and the Ongoing Civil War," David Blight in The Atlantic, April, 2015.
-
"Multiracial Democracy Is 55 Years Old. Will It Survive?," Adam Serwer in The Atlantic, January, 2021.
-
Anchor of the Soul, a documentary about Black history in Maine, 1994
-
"W.E.B. Du Bois’ Visionary Infographics Come Together for the First Time in Full Color," wherein his pioneering team of black sociologists created data visualizations that explained institutionalized racism to the world, Smithsonian, 2018
- Life of a Klansman: A Family History in White Supremacy, Edward Ball, 2020
March 19, 2021 — Is that for real? Conspiracy Theories in American Politics
"It is easier to accept a simple lie than a complex truth." — Alexis de Tocqueville
We’ll talk about the political and social conditions that give rise to conspiracy movements. Why are people drawn to these ideas? What are the conditions in civil society that are feeding into these trends? How have these moments come up in our history? How have we gotten past it before? Can democracy function when these beliefs are widespread?
Special Guests:
- Jamie McKown, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, James Russell Wiggins Chair in Government and Polity at College of the Atlantic. Jamie teaches a course on Conspiracy Theory and Political Discourse
-
Joanne Miller, Associate Professor, Political Science & International Relations, Director of Graduate Studies, University of Delaware. Joanne's research centers on political psychology, political propaganda, misinformation and conspiracy theories.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Speaking of Psychology: Why people believe in conspiracy theories, with Karen Douglas, PhD, podcast of the American Psychological Association
-
Gender Differences in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs, Erin C. Cassese, Christina E. Farhart, and Joanne M. Miller. 2020
-
A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy, Nancy L. Rosenblum and Russell Muirhead, 2019
February 19, 2021 — Can Democracy Survive the Internet?
“The point of modern propaganda isn't only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.” — Garry Kasparov, chess grandmaster and political activist
We’ll talk about our information ecosystem and how it's contributed to this very divisive moment in American politics: how did it go wrong, can we fix it? Can democracy survive the Internet? What role do mis- and dis-information, social media, media silos, and alternative realities play in fostering extremism? How are these issues playing out right here in real-world Maine? What remedies are suggested by research?
Special Guests:
- Ronald J Deibert, Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, Director of The Citizen LabMunk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, and author of the new book, Reset: Reclaiming the Internet for Civil Society
- Andy O'Brien, freelance journalist for the magazine, Mainer, where he has been reporting on far-right groups in Maine. His writings have been published in Down East, Huffington Post, and Labor Notes. He is also a former Maine state legislator, former managing editor of the Free Press in Rockland, and the current communications director for the Maine AFL-CIO.
Key Topics:
-
What do people mean by the term “information ecosystem," and how has it changed in the last generation?
-
Do mis- and dis-information promulgate primarily on social media?
-
How do we see this playing out here in Maine?
-
Profitability of outrage: how do social media giants make money on this stuff?
-
Is there a positive vision of what social media could be; how it could contribute to deliberative democracy?
-
What are other countries doing? Why is the US so far behind?
-
What could the U.S. do better within our constitutional framework?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
Reset: Reclaiming the Internet for Civil Society, Ronald Deibert, 2020
-
By Andy O'Brien from Mainer:
- "Hatebook" – The Facebook group that promoted violence and death threats against Safiya Khalid, the first Somali-American elected to the Lewiston City Council
- "Leaks Show Mainer’s Online Radicalization By Neo-Nazi Terrorist Cult"
- "UMaine College Republicans Caught in MAGA Civil War"
- "Maine GOP Leadership Goes to Bat for White Nationalistic College Club"
-
"Mob thinking has grown as news moves online," Sara Fischer/Axios, January 2021
-
"Banning Trump won't fix social media: 10 ideas to rebuild our broken internet – by experts," The Guardian, January 2021
-
"Trump Is Fighting Section 230 for the Wrong Reason," The Atlantic, January 2021
-
"How to Deal With a Crisis of Misinformation," Brian Chen, The New York Times, October 2020
-
House to grill Facebook, Google, Twitter CEOs as Washington seeks to crack down on disinformation, antitrust, Washington Post, February 2021
January 15, 2021 — Searching for Common Ground across the Political Divide
Matthew 12: "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand."
We’ll talk about the political divide in the aftermath of the 2020 general election. Do we share any common ground? What happened at “America in One Room?” What lessons can we learn about American democracy and its future? How can we shape our democratic institutions to foster more deliberation? What lessons can we learn about engaging in deliberation everyday?
Special Guests:
- Larry Diamon, Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Professor, by courtesy, of Political Science and Sociology
- James Fishkin, Janet M Peck Chair of International Communication, Professor of Political Science (by courtesy), and Director of the Center for Deliberative Democracy.
- Steve Wessler, Maine human rights educator, trainer, and advocate specializing in conflict resolution
Key Topics:
-
What happened at "American in One Room?"
-
What did you learn about polarization and common ground?
-
What do you mean with the phrase, "deliberative democracy?"
-
What are the values, fears, and misperceptions that divide us?
-
Are there opportunities for us to practice deliberative democracy in our private and public lives and in our democratic institutions?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
-
These 526 Voters Represent All of America. And They Spent a Weekend Together, New York Times, October, 2019
-
"Pulling Our Politics Back from the Brink," The New Yorker, November, 2020
-
"You're Wrong About: Losing Relatives to Fox News" on Apple Podcasts
- The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good, Michaels J Sandel, 2020
Talk radio with LWVME
Blue Hill at WERU Community Radio, 89.9 FM — Tune on the third Friday of the month, from 4:00 — 5:00 PM. Stream online at WERU.org.
Portland at WMPG Community Radio, 90.9 FM — Tune in the first Sunday of the following month at 11:30 AM. Stream online at WMPG.org.
How it began:
Beginning in 2004 and in every presidential election year between 2004 and 2016, the League of Women Voters — Downeast produced and sponsored a series of radio programs on topics in participatory democracy called the Democracy Forum. Beginning in 2017, we continued the series monthly.
In September 2018, the Democracy Forum won top honors from the Maine Association of Broadcasting for public affairs radio. The award-winning episode was from May, 2018: "Immigration: Can We Live Without It?"
Programs from the 2017 archive, 2016 archive, 2012 archive, and the 2008 archive are also available online.
2020
November 20 -- Election Reflections 2020
This episode was pre-recorded on November 19. No listener calls were taken.
“There's no such thing as a vote that doesn't matter." Barack Obama
We will talk about the November 3 general election, what just happened here in Maine and around the country, what went right, what went wrong, and what it says about the future of our democracy.
Special Guests:
- Shelly Crosby, Orono Town Clerk and the President of the Maine Town and City Clerks Association
- Matt Dunlap, Maine Secretary of State
- Amy Fried, Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Jill Goldthwait, Award-winning columnist for the Ellsworth American and the Mount Desert Islander, and former independent Maine State Senator
- Meg McCormick, Maine Director & New England Coordinator, Campus Election Engagement Project.
Key Topics:
- What went right; what went wrong in Maine?
Were there any surprises?
What about turnout? Was overall participation high? Were there any changes in who showed up?
What was the effect of COVID on turnout and operations? Do you think some of those changes are here to stay?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
Half of Americans Don’t Vote. What Are They Thinking? Colin Woodard in Politico, February 2020
College Students, Voting and the COVID-19 Election, Knight Foundation, August 2020
The 100 Million Project: The Untold Story of American Non-Voters, Knight Foundation
- Polarization and the Politics of Personal Responsibility. Jeffrey M. Stonecash and Mark D. Brewer 2015
In Suspense: Donald Trump’s Efforts to Undermine Public Trust in Democracy, Amy Fried and Donald B. Harris, October, 2020.
October 16 -- Who's Showing Up to Vote in November?
This new episode was pre-recorded on October 14. No listener calls were taken, but comments may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
“Every election is determined by the people who show up.” Larry Sabato, Center for Politics at UVA, Pendulum Swing
We will talk about research into voter motivation; how new information can affect the way people form political opinions, make political choices and, ultimately, take political actions; and how research into voter motivation might be relevant in the 2020 General Election.
Special Guests:
- Shelly Crosby, Orono Town Clerk and the President of the Maine Town and City Clerks Association
- Yanna Krupnikov, Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at Stony Brook University
- Meg McCormick, Maine Director & New England Coordinator, Campus Election Engagement Project
Key Topics:
- What does the research show about why so many people don't vote in high-stakes elections?
What factors, if any, are likely to motivate people to vote this year, this late in the election season?
To what extent are people making a rational decision not to vote: calculating correctly that it really doesn’t make much difference on the issues that are acutely important to them?
What affect do "October surprises" actually have on election outcomes?
What are the most effective methods of engaging reluctant voters?
- What messages or information can voter engagement activists still use effectively in the GOTV efforts?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
Half of Americans Don’t Vote. What Are They Thinking? Colin Woodard in Politico, February 2020
College Students, Voting and the COVID-19 Election, Knight Foundation, August 2020
The 100 Million Project: The Untold Story of American Non-Voters, Knight Foundation
- Maine watchdog may probe shadowy poll aimed at Democratic legislative hopeful, Bangor Daily News, September 2020
- Opinion | Is America Hopelessly Polarized, or Just Allergic to Politics? (Published 2019), Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov and John Barry Ryan, New York Times, April 2019
- Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction, Samara Klar and Yanna Krupnikov, 2016
September 18 -- Who Votes, Who Can't, and Who Won't
This new episode will be pre-recorded on September 16. No listener calls were taken, but comments may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
“We must protest peacefully, demand persistently, and fight politically. But most of all, we must vote in November.” -- Derrick Johnson, President and CEO of the NAACP
We'll talk about voter participation in marginalized communities: structural/ systemic/
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Maulian Dana, Penobscot Nation Ambassador
- Michael Kebede, Policy Counsel, ACLU of Maine
- Chryl Laird, Assistant Professor of Government, Bowdoin College
Key Topics:
- In Maine, given that our laws are pretty inclusive, what obstacles to voting do people in marginalized communities still face?
What about the motivational barriers that people face?
To what extent are people making a rational decision not to vote: calculating correctly that it really doesn’t make much difference on the issues that are acutely important to them?
Maine does not exist in a bubble democracy. Can we get the public policy we want if other states or the federal government are skewed by voter suppression?
What special issues arise for indigenous people? Has voting for the tribes been complicated by issues of sovereignty?
What can citizens do here in Maine?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- How Shelby County v. Holder Broke America, Vann R. Newkirk II, The Atlantic, July 2018
- America's Relentless Suppression of Black Voters, Lawrence Goldstone, The New Republic, October 2018.
- Young Black Americans not sold on Biden, the Democrats or voting, David C. Barker and Sam Fulwood III, The Conversation, August 2020
- Systematic Inequality and American Democracy, Danyelle Solomon, Connor Maxwell, and Abril Castro, Center for American Progress, August 2019
- Why So Many Black Voters Are Democrats, Even When They Aren’t Liberal, Cheryl N. Laird, Ismail K. White, FiveThirtyEight, February 2020
- Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior, Cheryl N. Laird, Ismail K. White, February 2020
- Maine: State of our Democracy, a report from the League of Women Voters of Maine, April 2020
- FRRC is one of several nonprofits that are raising money to help returning citizen pay find and fee in Florida, as mentioned on the show.
- Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, Matthew Desmond, 2016
July 17 -- Election Reflections: July 14, 2020
Our live programming at WERU is a casualty of the ongoing civil defense against COVID-19. Our loyal partners at WERU have taken steps to limit exposure for their volunteers and staff. We were on the air as scheduled, Friday, July 17, at 4:00 p.m. with a new episode pre-recorded on July 16. No listener calls were taken, but comments could be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"Let’s do this another way. Let’s stop thinking that our voice don’t matter and vote. Educate yourself and know who you’re voting for. And that’s how we gonna hit 'em. Because it’s a lot of us. It’s a lot of us. It’s a lot of us." -- Terrence Floyd
We'll talk about who won the Maine primaries and why. How did Maine elections work under COVID restrictions? What does it all mean for the high-stakes election in November?
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Matt Dunlap, Maine Secretary of State
- Amy Fried, Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Jill Goldthwait, award-winning columnist for the Ellsworth American and the Mount Desert Islander.
Key Topics:
- How did it go overall?
How much absentee voting, how much on Election Day?
What was turnout overall compared to other non-gubernatorial primaries?
Were there any problems?
What adjustments does this suggest for November?
How did Election Day go for you? Let us know by filling out the survey that applies to you. These surveys will be used by voter advocacy groups to improve processes for the November election.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- As November Looms, So Does the Most Litigious Election Ever, New York Times, July 7, 2020
Election results not expected to be delayed in Maine despite virus changes, Bangor Daily News, July 8, 2020
Poll gives Dale Crafts edge in GOP primary in Maine’s 2nd District, Bangor Daily News, July 8, 2020
Clerks report record absentee ballots for July 14 election, Portland Press Herald, July 2, 2020
What Went Wrong in the Wisconsin Election, and What We Can Learn From It Before November, Time, April 2020
After record primary turnout, Iowa Senate Republicans try to limit vote-by-mail in presidential election, Fortune, June 2020
New York candidates left on hold as primary results trickle in, The Hill, July 2020
Georgia Primary Issues Sow Concerns About General Election, NPR, June 2020
How The Elections In Nebraska And Wisconsin Managed Amid The Pandemic, FiveThirtyEight, May 2020
June 19 -- One Person, One Vote: The Electoral College and the NPV
Our live programming at WERU is a casualty of the ongoing civil defense against COVID-19. Our loyal partners at WERU have taken steps to limit exposure for their volunteers and staff. We will be on the air as scheduled, Friday, June 19, at 4:00 p.m. with a new episode pre-recorded on June 17. No listener calls will be taken, but comments may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
"So you have these battleground state voters who have all of the power and you have flyover state voters who have none of the power… I think this is leading to a corrupt and toxic body politic ...” Saul Azunis from a speech given at the Suncoast Tiger Club Luncheon on 9/19/19
We will talk about the Electoral College, is it working as intended—and by the way, what was intended?—what issues have emerged over time, is Popular Election of the President a solution, and where does the National Popular Vote Compact fit in.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive.
Special Guests:
- Saul Anuznis, principal and managing partner of Coast to Coast Strategies
- Mark Brewer, professor of political science at the University of Maine - Orono
- Eileen Reavey, national grassroots director at National Popular Vote
Key Topics:
- What was the founders' intent for the Electoral College?
- How has the Electoral College functioned historically?
- What demographic and political changes are altering the landscape in modern America?
- What reform proposals are being considered?
- How would the National Popular Vote work?
- Why is it a good idea—or not—for Maine?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- "National Popular Vote: Bipartisan Reform to Presidential Elections," Patrick Rosenstiel and Scott Drexel in RealClear Politics, January 2020.
- "Want to Fix Presidential Elections? Here’s the Quickest Way," Tim Foley, Politico, May, 2019
“Steve Vladeck: Is democracy rigged? The debate over Senate representation ignores a much more plausible reform,” NBC News, October, 2018
“Don’t Believe the Myths about the National Popular Vote”, Saul Anuzis, The Hill, May, 2018
“The Electoral College badly distorts the vote. And it’s going to get worse,” Katy Collin, Washington Post, November, 2016.
May 15 -- Ranked Choice Voting: How's It Working in 2020
This show will be pre-recorded on May 13 for broadcast on May 15. No listener calls will be taken, but comments may be emailed to news@weru.org with Democracy Forum on the subject line.
We will talk about ranked choice voting (RCV) in the upcoming July and November elections in Maine, developments in other states, the possible effect of a people's veto and a pending law suit, and more.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- John Brautigam, Esq., Senior Advisor & Counsel, League of Women Voters of Maine
- Hon. Marc Roberts, 4th term Republican State Legislator from Utah
Key Topics:
- Is RCV a partisan issue? Why does it seem partisan?
What has been Utah's experience with RCV? Why do Utah Republicans support it?
What races will use RCV in Maine in July? How is RCV affecting those races?
What races will use RCV in Maine in November? How is RCV affecting those races?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Maine Republicans seek to repeal ranked-choice voting in presidential elections. Portland Press Herald, February 4, 2020
- Maine Voices: Ranked-choice presidential primaries would give boost to moderates, Sandy Maisel Op-ed in the Portland Press Herald, March 3, 2020
Portland voters approve expansion of ranked-choice voting, Bangor Daily News, March 3, 2020
- Ranked-choice voting backers file suit seeking to block Maine GOP people’s veto effort
Bangor Daily News, April 16, 2020
April 17 -- Voting in a Pandemic: The Upcoming Primary Election in Maine
We will talk about how the continuing COVID-19 emergency might change voting procedures in Maine's upcoming primary election and what steps are being taken to protect the election, election workers, and the voting public.
Special Guests:
- Alison Beyea, Executive Director, ACLU Maine
- Matt Dunlap, Maine Secretary of State
Key Topics:
- How will COVID-19 affect the June primary?
What decisions have already been made?
What would advocates like to see change for the primary election?
What other ideas are being discussed?
What can ordinary citizens do to help?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Our View: COVID-19 will change Maine Election Day traditions, Portland Press Herald editorial, April 5, 2020.
- A Primary? In a Pandemic?, The Atlantic, March, 2020
Voting in the time of the coronavirus, Sue Halperin, The New Yorker, March, 2020
'It's Madness.' Wisconsin's Election Amid Coronavirus Sparks Anger, NPR, April, 2020
"The Lessons of the Election of 1918," New York Times, March, 2020
February 21 -- Super Tuesday Comes to Maine March 3
We will talk about Maine's first presidential primary in two decades. How is the presidential primary going to work, how will delegates to national conventions be apportioned and selected, what role will municipal caucuses continue to play, what will be the differences among the parties. We'll take listener questions during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Kenneth Palmer, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Lisa Roberts, Executive Director of the Maine Democratic Party
- Richard Rosen, former Republican State Legislator and former Commissioner of the Maine State Department of Administrative and Financial Services
Key Topics:
- What is the history of primaries and caucuses in Maine?
- Why did we make the change back to primaries for this year?
- How will the parties' nominees be chosen? How does the Maine primary feed into that selection?
- Will we still have municipal caucuses? What will they do?
- Who can participate?
- What are the key dates for people to remember?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- "The Primary Versus the Caucus," PBS Newshour, 2003
"Primaries v caucuses: a handy primer," Harry J Enten in The Guardian, 2012.
- League of Women Voters of Maine, "Study Guide on Primary Elections," 2018.
- "Maine switched to a presidential primary in 2020. Here’s why parties are still caucusing," Bangor Daily News, February 9, 2020.
- "The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process," The Council on Foreign Relations, January, 2020.
- What to Know About the Iowa Caucuses, Pew Research Center, January, 2020
- Primary Politics: Everything You Need to Know about How America Nominates Its Presidential Candidates 4th Edition, Elaine C. Kamarck, Brookings Institution Press, November, 2018
Read about and listen to past programs from the League archive.
January 17-- Census 2020: Everyone Counts
We'll talk about the upcoming decennial census, how it's going to work, problems on the horizon, and the consequences for Maine and the nation. We'll take listener questions during the second half of the show. talk about ,
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
Margo Anderson is a Distinguished Professor Emerita from UW-Milwaukee and an expert on the history of the census.
Matt Dunlap is the Maine Secretary of State and Chair of the State's Complete Count Committee.
Key Topics:
- What is the history of the U.S. Census? How will it be different this year?
What are the important uses of census data nationwide and here in Maine?
- What is being planned for 2020? Are there problems on the horizon?
- Specifically, how important is this for Maine? Could Maine lose a congressional district?
- How is it going to work logistically this year? Is the risk of an undercount a serious problem?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- The American Census: A Social History, by Margo J. Anderson 2015.
- "The 2020 Census may be wildly inaccurate--and it matters more than you think," Robert Shapiro for the Brookings Institution, August, 2017
- "Special Report: 2020 U.S. census plagued by hacking threats, cost overruns," Nick Brown for Reuters, December, 2019
- Robert Frost poem, "The Census Taker"
- Tina Fey and Betty White in a 2010 Census skit on SNL
- Census Bureau outreach page with map
Fact Sheets from the Census Bureau
More Information from the Census Bureau
Read about and listen to past programs from the League archive.
2019
November 15 - Is Government Doing Good: Policy Feedback Effects and the Civic Divide
“There's a tremendous gap between public opinion and public policy.” Noam Chomsky
We'll talk about new political science research into policy feedback effects and how public policy design affects people's sense of themselves as citizens and their propensity to participate. We'll take listener questions during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
Amy Fried, Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Don Moynihan, the McCourt Chair at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University
Key Topics:
- The study of policy feedback effects seems to be a new area of political science research. Give us an overview of what people are talking about and what the research is teaching us.
How does this reflect on the political behavior of the America electorate?
- Give us some examples on both sides, positive and negative feedbacks.
- What are the implications for lawmakers? The practical applications?
- How can this research be harnessed to create more effective public policy and more engaged citizens?
- Is there a role for ordinary citizens and advocates in making new laws better?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means, Pamela Herd and Donald P. Moynihan, December 2018
- “Citizens feel disconnected from government. If they knew what government did for them, they wouldn’t.” Interview with Susan Mettler, Washington Post, November 2018
- Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted , Eric M. Patashnik, 2009
- Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation by Suzanne Mettler, 2005
- Citizens By Degree: Higher Education Policy and the Changing Gender Dynamics of American Citizenship, by Deondra Rose, 2018
- Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics by Jamila Michener, 2018
- “The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Voter Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment,” by Katherin Baicker and Amy Finkelstein in the Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2019
October 18 - Hate and Fear in Politics: How Fear and Anger Endanger Democracy
“...The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror...” Franklin D. Roosevelt’s First Inaugural Address
We'll talk about hate and fear in politics and whether they undermine democracy: how panic and fear make space for abandoning the rule of law and the regular order; how when we demonize the opposition, it makes room for extraordinary measures to stop them. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Joanne Freeman, Professor of History and American Studies at Yale University
- Steve Wessler, Maine human rights educator, trainer, and advocate specializing in conflict resolution
Key Topics:
- How is the present moment in American politics different from others in our history? Or is it?
- What does the current moment of extreme polarization have in common with other times in our history?
- Are hate and fear related? And then what role does race and ethnicity play?
- What role does the rapid and destabilizing pace of change play?
- To the extent that fear is tool for political mobilization, is it one that works symmetrically for liberals and conservatives?
- How can we get past this moment? How did we get past it before?
- What can ordinary citizens do -- if they want to?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- "Trump and the Politics of Fear," Molly Ball in The Atlantic, September, 2016.
- "America Descends into the Politics of Rage," Joanne Freeman in The Atlantic, October, 2018
- "The Upside of Anger," Isaac Chotiner interviews Martha C. Nussbaum for Slate, August, 2018.
- "The Flight 93 Election," blog post by Publius Decius Mus, September, 2016, that was recognized with a 2016 Sidney Award from David Brooks.
September 20 - Black, White, and Blue Lies: Lies that Divide, Lies that Unite
“P.T. Barnum taught us to love spectacle, fake news, and a good hoax. A century and a half later the show has escaped the tent.” -- James Parker, staff writer for The Atlantic
We'll talk about the lies in politics and the politics of lying, historical examples, current practice, and the consequences for democracy. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Dallas G. Denery II, Professor of History at Bowdoin College. He wrote the book, The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment.
- Nancy L. Rosenblum, the Harvard University Senator Joseph Clark Professor of Ethics in Politics and Government emerita. With Russell Muirhead, she is co-author of the book, A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy.
Key Topics:
- How is the present moment in American politics different from others in our history? Or is it?
- Remember the old riddle about the truthful Whitefoot and the lying Blackfoot? How can people know who to trust?
- How does trust in government -- or distrust -- play into this? What is the recent history of trust in government in America?
- What characterizes white lies, black lies, and blue lies? Where do conspiracy theories fit and how do they work?
- How much of this is because of the rapidly changing media paradigm? Did we have similar examples from the dawn of the broadcast age? What responsibility does the media have to combat disinformation and lying?
- What can ordinary citizens do to protect themselves -- if they want to?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- "How the Science of “Blue Lies” May Explain Trump’s Support," guest blog at the Scientific American by Jeremy Adam Smith,
- "Trump’s lies corrode democracy," James Pfiffner for Brookings,
- "A Behavioral Science Solution to Lies in Politics," blogpost at Psychology Today by Gleb Tsipursky, June 2017.
- "Conspiracy Without the Theory," by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum in The Atlantic,
April, 2019.
July 19 - Town Government: Take 2. Listeners have spoken!
I'll take the problems of small town politics over Washington chaos any day. -- Roger Bowen, former Gouldsboro Selectman.
Back by popular demand. We'll talk more about practicing politics and democracy at the most personal level, in local government. What are the characteristics of the towns that have the most civic participation? How can community members help create a culture of inclusion and civic engagement in their own towns? What can go right; and what can go wrong? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Susan Clark, author and facilitator focusing on community sustainability and citizen participation. She serves as Town Moderator of Middlesex, Vermont.
- Susan Lessard, Bucksport Town Manager.
- Dick Thompson, moderator for Towns of Palermo, China, Vassalboro, and others, Dick conducts moderator training for the Maine Municipal Association.
Key Topics:
- Regaining lost democracy: is local activism the "new frontier" for civic engagement?
- How's it working? Who participates? Is it now, has it always been an insider's game?
- Is local politics as uncivil and sharply divided as national politics?
- What characterizes the towns with the most community engagement?
- How can you find out what you need to know to get involved and be effective?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Slow Democracy: Rediscovering Community, Bringing Decision Making Back Home , Susan Clark and Woden Teachout, 2012.
- Managing Town Hall meetings so that everyone benefits (and relatively few are miserable), Della Rucker in Creating a Wise Economy, May, 2015.
- Citizen's Guide to Town Meeting, Maine Municipal Association.
- For the People, by the People: What I saw when I participated in one of the truest forms of democracy, Amy Crawford in Slate May, 2013.
- Americans Aren't Practicing Democracy Anymore: As participation in civic life has dwindled, so has public faith in the country's system of government, Yoni Applebaum in The Atlantic October, 2018.
- We all should care more about local elections, editorial in the Bangor Daily News, July 6, 2019.
- I'll take the problems of local politics over the Washington chaos any day, Roger Bowen op-ed in the BDN, May 21, 2018.
- More citizen education from the Maine Municipal Assocation here and tips on how to get involved in local government here.
June 2019 - Town Meeting: "Doing Democracy" in Your Town
Town meetings are to liberty what primary schools are to science; they bring it into the people's reach. -- Alexis de Tocqueville.
We will talk about practicing politics and democracy at the most personal level, in local government, and the unusual experience we enjoy in the form of the New England town meeting. Does the town meeting still work? Is participation up or down? Is partisanship creeping in? Is money "from away" taking more of an interest? If you've never been, what do you need to know? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Susan Clark, author and facilitator focusing on community sustainability and citizen participation. She serves as Town Moderator of Middlesex, Vermont.
- Susan Lessard, Bucksport Town Manager.
- Dick Thompson, moderator for Towns of Palermo, China, Vassalboro, and others, Dick conducts moderator training for the Maine Municipal Association.
Key Topics:
- What's the history of the town meeting in New England?
- How's it working? Who participates? Is it now, has it always been an insider's game?
- Is local politics as uncivil and sharply divided as national politics?
- Which towns have town meeting? What are the alternatives? How do the alternatives stack up?
- Regaining lost democracy: is local activism the "new frontier" for civic engagement?
- If you've never gone, how can you find out what you need to know?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Slow Democracy: Rediscovering Community, Bringing Decision Making Back Home , Susan Clark and Woden Teachout, 2012.
- Managing Town Hall meetings so that everyone benefits (and relatively few are miserable), Della Rucker in Creating a Wise Economy, May, 2015.
- Citizen's Guide to Town Meeting, Maine Municipal Association.
- For the People, by the People: What I saw when I participated in one of the truest forms of democracy, Amy Crawford in Slate May, 2013.
- Americans Aren't Practicing Democracy Anymore: As participation in civic life has dwindled, so has public faith in the country's system of government, Yoni Applebaum in The Atlantic October, 2018.
- More citizen education from the Maine Municipal Assocation here.
May 2019 - Democracy vs. Republic: Why Should We Care?
"Our Founding Fathers who created this republic did not believe in democracy. When did we come to worship this idol?" Pat Buchanan, September, 2012
We will talk about whether we live in a democracy or a republic. What do people mean when they say, "We're not a democracy; we're a republic," in the context of different policy debates. Is there a particular subtext implicating minority rights, even minority rule, and possibly states' rights and federalism? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Lance Dutson, a principal of Red Hill Strategies, a Republican communications consultant, and a columnist for the Bangor Daily News.
- Joseph R. Reisert, Harriet S. and George C. Wiswell Jr. Assistant Professor of American Constitutional Law in the Department of Government at Colby College.
Key Topics:
- What do the words mean: "republic" and "democracy"?
- What were the founders' fears and intent?
- Is this debate as old as the republic? Why does it keep flaring up?
- How has that played out? What do we have now?
- Why are these trigger words right now?
- Are these two diametrically opposed or mutually exclusive? Or is it a false dichotomy?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Democracy or Republic?, Jay Cost in National Review September, 2018.
- Sorry, Liberals, But America Is Not A Democracy, And It's Better That Way,, Clifford Humphrey in The Federalist February, 2018.
- Is the U.S. a Democracy? A Social Studies Battle Turns on the Nation's Values Dana Goldstein in The New York Times April, 2019.
- Is the United States of America a republic or a democracy? Eugene Volokh, The Volokh Conspiracy, at The Washington Post May, 2015.
- You Say Democracy, I Say Republic, Jonathan Bernstein in Bloomberg April, 2019.
- Ayn Rand, Rand Paul, and More YouTube
April 2019 - Citizen Initiatives: The Devil's in the Details
"Just vote us in, we'll take care of the rest. (Or, don't worry your pretty little heads about it.)" Starr Gilmartin, League of Women Voters, Downeast. March 28, 2019.
We will explore the historical origins of the initiative provisions, how initiatives actually work in Maine, our contemporary experience with them, their effect on politics and elections, the tension between direct and representative democracy, and proposals for reform, many of which are being debated in the Maine State Legislature right now.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Joshua J. Dyck, Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Center for Public Opinion at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.
- Michael Franz, Professor of Government and Legal Studies at Bowdoin College.
Key Topics:
- When did citizen initiatives get added to the Maine State Constitution and why?
- Are these provision a good institutional check on the legislature or do they undermine representative government?
- When do they work, and what can go wrong?
- What has been Maine's historical experience?
- Can initiatives be used for other strategic purposes? How does that work?
- What reform proposals are being considered in Maine right now?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Initiatives without Engagement A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy's Secondary Effects, Joshua J. Dyck and Edward L. Lascher, Jr., 2019
- Ballot Questions in Maine, Polling Edition, Michael Franz, April, 2019.
- Miller-Rose Initiative Database at the Rose Institute of State and Local Government, Claremont McKenna College.
- Seizing the Initiative: A Short History of Direct Democracy in America Nick Johnson, April, 2018.
- American Voters Are Turning to Direct Democracy, Vann Newkirk, Atlantic April 2018.
March 2019 - The Electoral College: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
"...You win some, you lose some. And then there's that little-known third category." Al Gore, 2004
We'll talk about the electoral college, its historical origins and the founders' intent, the practical implications for modern American politics, and proposals for reform, including the National Popular Vote (NPV). The Maine legislature is currently debating whether Maine should join the NPV compact.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Mark Brewer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Maine.
- Rep. Jamie Raskin, Professor Law at American University Washington College of Law and a U.S. Congressman representing Maryland's 8th District.
- Pat Rosenstiel, CEO of Ainsley Shea, a Minneapolis-based public relations firm working to advance the National Popular Vote.
Key Topics:
- What was the founders' intent for the Electoral College?
- How has the Electoral College functioned historically?
- What demographic and political changes are altering the landscape in modern America?
- What reform proposals are being considered for the Electoral College or in the states' selection of electors?
- How would the National Popular Vote work? Why is it a good idea--or not--for Maine?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- As American as Apple Pie? The Rural Vote's Disproportionate Slice of Power Emily Badger in The New York Times, November, 2016.
- The real reason we have an Electoral College: to protect slave states Sean Illing interviews Akhil Reed Amar in Vox, November, 2016.
- The Electoral College badly distorts the vote. And it's going to get worse. Katy Collin in The Washington Post, November, 2016.
- Don't Believe the Myths about the National Popular Vote, Saul Anuzis, The Hill, May, 2018.
- Constitutional Law Professor Drops Bombshell on `Forgotten Americans' at Democrats' Electoral College Meeting, Jamie Raskin, Alternet December, 2016.
- An Idea for Electoral College Reform That Both Parties Might Actually Like, Edward B. Foley, Politico January, 2019.
- Alternative view: National Popular Vote would amplify Maine voices and empower small states, Patrick Rosenstiel in the Maine Wire, March 10, 2019.
February 2019 -- The Free Press and a Functioning Democracy
"Were it left to me to decide whether we should have government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every [one] should receive those papers & be capable of reading them." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Edward Carrington, 1787
We'll talk about democracy, journalism, the state of play in American news. Can fact-based journalism survive? Can democracy survive otherwise? We'll take listener questions by email at info@weru.org with "Democracy Forum" in the subject line. This program is being produced with support from the Maine Humanities Council.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Earl Brechlin was the founding editor of the award-winning weekly newspaper, the Mount Desert Islander, and former editor of the Bar Harbor Times.
- Burt Neuborne is the Norman Dorsen Professor of Civil Liberties and founding Legal Director of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School.
- Judy Woodruff is the anchor and managing editor of the PBS Newshour.
Key Topics:
- What was the founders' conception of the first amendment? Why did they put it first? And why was it important to protect the free press?
- What business, cultural, and technological changes are altering the journalistic landscape in the 21st century?
- Disinformation campaigns and yellow journalism go back to the founding of democracy. Is it different now or more dangerous?
- What can ordinary citizens do?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- More Important But Less Robust? Five Things Everybody Needs to Know about the Future of Journalism Reuters Institute Report, January, 2019
- Does Journalism have a Future? Jill Lepore in The New Yorker, January 28, 2019
- Is journalism's `pivot to dust' arriving? Megan McArdle in the Washington Post, January 26, 2019
- How We Know Journalism is Good for Democracy, Josh Stearns, posted at Medium, a publication of PACE: Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement, June 26, 2018
- Local newspapers have already been gutted. There's nothing left to cut. Steve Cavendish, the Washington Post, January 25, 2019.
- Madison's Music: On Reading the First Amendment, Burt Neuborne, 2015.
January 2019 -- Cyber Attacks on Democracy: Social Media, Fake News, and Voter Responsibility
"The advancement and diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true Liberty. " -- James Madison
We'll talk about cyber attacks on elections, weaponizing misinformation, social media, and disinformation. Is this the new normal? Can democracy survive? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, Elizabeth Ware Packard Professor of Communication at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg School for Communication, the Walter and Leonore Director of the university's Annenberg Public Policy Center, and Program Director of the Annenberg Retreat at Sunnylands.
- Jamie McKown, Faculty, Government & Polity at the College of the Atlantic and James Russell Wiggins Chair in Government and Polity.
Key Topics:
- What about Prof. Jamieson's new book, Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect A President?
- What do we know? What don't we know? And what may we never know?
- By what means and to what extent did this affect the outcome of the election?
- Disinformation campaigns go back to the founding of democracy. Is this different or more dangerous?
- Are domestic campaign organizations adopting similar tactics? Will this be the new normal?
- If it's war, what can ordinary citizens do to help de-escalate?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- NewsFeed Defenders
- FlackCheck.org
- Can Mark Zuckerberg Fix Facebook Before It Breaks Democracy?, Evan Osnos in The New Yorker, September, 2018.
- Machine Politics, Fred Turner in Harpers Magazine, January, 2019.
- Secret campaign to use Russian-inspired tactics in 2017 Ala. election stirs anxiety for Democrats, Washington Post, January, 2019.
- New Report on Russian Disinformation Prepared for the Senate shows the Operations Scale and Sweep, Washington Post, December, 2018.
- New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics, Aaron Mate, The Nation, December, 2018.
- The most underplayed story of the 2016 election is voter suppression, Rachelle Hampton, The New Republic, January, 2019.
- How campaigns can protect themselves from deepfakes, disinformation, and social media manipulation, Lisa Kaplan, Brookings, January 10, 2019.
2018
November 2018 -- Election 2018: What Happened and What Does It Mean?
"Every election matters. ...[E]very election provides lessons worth learning." -- Chuck Todd, Meet the Press
We'll talk about who won in Maine and why. How do the election outcomes in Maine reflect national trends--or not--along the dimensions of party majorities, women and minority candidates, voter turnout, demographics, and voter suppression? What does it all mean for governing in the biennium ahead? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- John Baughman, Associate Professor of Politics, Bates College
- Jill Goldthwait, Award-winning columnist for the Ellsworth American and the Mount Desert Islander, retired nurse and former independent Maine State Senator.
Key Topics:
- Who won in Maine and why?
- How does that reflect national trends?
- What were the trends among women running for office and in voter turnout among women?
- Was voter turnout a factor? How did turnout compare to prior mid-term elections?
- Was voter suppression a factor?
- What role did ranked choice voting play?
- What are the opportunities for citizens to have an effect on federal and state policy for the next two to four years?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- 2018: Another 'Year of the Woman' Brookings, November 8, 2018.
- Americans will head to the polls in a week. Here's why some won't. Washington Post, October 30, 2018.
- Maine's toss-up 2nd District appears headed to a ranked-choice count, Bangor Daily News, November 7, 2018.
- Brian Kemp's Lead in Georgia Needs an Asterisk, The Atlantic, November 7, 2018.
- 2018 exit polls show greater white support for Democrats, Brookings, November 8, 2018.
October 2018 -- Political Polls: Can We Ever Trust Them Again?
"Do you ever get the feeling that the only reason we have elections is to find out if the polls were right? - " -- Robert Orben, comedy writer and one time magician
We'll talk about the state of the art in political polling, why polls sometimes get it wrong, the emerging challenges for pollsters, and what citizens need to know about who and what to believe. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Amy Fried, Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine
- Courtney Kennedy, Director, Survey Research, Pew Research Center.
Key Topics:
- Polls and pollsters are not all created equal. How can ordinary people judge what they're hearing?
- What are some of the emerging challenges in polling now?
- Can media reporting on polls affect voter behavior and election turnout?
- Are there sources of polling information that people can generally trust? Or should ordinary people just ignore them?
- What can citizens do to become smarter consumers of polling information?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
- Can we still trust polls? by Courtney Kennedy, May, 2018, from FactTank: News in Numbers at the Pew Research Center.
- Why Polling Can Be So Hard by Nate Cohn, September, 2018, from TheUpshot at the New York Times.
- You can trust the polls in 2018, if you read them carefully by Josh Pasek and Michael Traugott for The Conversation.
- Pathways to Polling: Crisis, Cooperation and the Making of Public Opinion Professions, Amy Fried, 2011.
September 2018 -- Elections in Maine: Where the Rubber Meets the Road
The voting booth joint is a great leveler; the whole neighborhood - rich, poor, old, young, decrepit and spunky - they all turn out in one day. -- David Byrne, Talking Heads
We'll talk about what citizens need to know about the conduct of elections in Maine: what are the opportunities for citizen participation and observation; what aspects are conducted by the State with regard to the security and integrity of the process and the electronic components; what role do the town clerks play in making sure things run smoothly, etc. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Patti Dubois, Waterville City Clerk.
- Julie Flynn, Deputy Secretary of State, Maine Secretary of State's Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions.
Key Topics:
- What can voters expect for Election Day 2018?
- Can Maine voters trust the election process?
- Which aspects are under the jurisdiction of the State of Maine? Which are under local control?
- How well-prepared is Maine for election disruption and foreign or political interference?
- What can citizens do if they suspect something is going wrong?
- What can citizens do to build confidence in local elections?
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
July 2018 -- Distrust in Government: A Necessary Evil or a Weapon of Destruction?
I think you all know that I've always felt the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help. -- President Ronald Reagan, The President's News Conference, August 12, 1986
We'll talk about the waxing and waning of Americans' trust in government, why a little skepticism may be a good thing, how partisanship plays into the equation, and how too much distrust may be a self-fulfilling prophecy. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Amy Fried, Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine.
- Thomas E. Mann, Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution and Resident Scholar, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
Key Topics:
- Has there been a steady decline of trust in government, particularly in the 21st century?
- Do we need a little distrust to make democracy work and keep it relatively free of corruption?
- Is the current distrust in government out of the ordinary ebb and flow? Has it gone too far? How can we tell?
- Have our attitudes about government been "played" for partisan advantage? How so and to what end?
- Is this equally true at the state level as it is at the federal level?
- What can we do to realign our attitudes?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
- Public Trust in Government: 1958-2017, Pew Research Center, December, 2017.
- The Strategic Promotion of Distrust in Government in the Tea Party Age, Amy Fried, 2015.
- Finding the Common Good in an Era of Dysfunctional Governance Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein, Daedelus, Spring 2013.
- A More Perfect Union, New York Times book review of Garry Willis's book, A Necessary Evil: A History of American Distrust of Government, 1999.
June 2018 - State Preemption: From Guns to Garbage, Who's Got the Power?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. -- 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
We'll talk about how federalism protects and constrains states' rights and how states can both protect and commandeer local control. From guns and garbage to water quality and pesticides, how much control do states and towns have to protect their assets or advance their values? We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Garrett Corbin, Legislative Advocate for the Maine Municipal Association.
- Lauren Phillips, J.D. Columbia Law School 2018, not yet admitted to practice law.
Key Topics:
- How do states and towns derive the power to govern under our constitution, under federalism?
- How can the states "preempt" or commandeer powers that might be assigned to the towns? Can the federal government do this to states, too?
- What is "home rule?" How can states rights and home rule be used to challenge unpopular state or federal policies?
- What can states and the federal government do to reign in these challenges?
- What are some examples from other states?
- How has this worked in Maine?
- What are some opportunities for states and towns to advance an agenda?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
- Impeding Innovation: State Preemption of Progressive Local Regulations, Lauren Phillips in the Columbia Law Review, Volume 117, No. 8, December 2017.
- Commentary: Weighing the cost of `home rule' in Maine, Colin Woodard in the Portland Press Herald, June 8, 2015.
- Blue Cities Want to Make Their Own Rules. Red States Won't Let Them. more from TheUpshot at the New York Times, July, 2017.
- From Fracking Bans To Paid Sick Leave: How States Are Overruling Local Laws, PR Watch's Lisa Graves on Fresh Air with Terry Gross, April, 2016.
- Soda And Fast Food Lobbyists Push State Preemption Laws To Prevent Local Regulation, Robb Waters in Forbes Magazine, June, 21, 2017.
- Municipal Approaches in Maine to Reduce Single-use Consumer Products, Travis Wagner in the Maine Policy Review, 2016.
- Preemption Watch Newsletter,
- Preemption Doctrine,by Ellerbe P. Cole, Maine Municipal Association in Maine Townsman,"Legal Notes," June 1991.
May 2018: Immigration: Can We Live Without It?
Immigration is not just a link to America's past; it's also a bridge to America's future. -- George W. Bush
We'll talk about immigration and jobs, federal policy, and its effect on economic development and workforce in Maine. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Dany Bahar, David M. Rubenstein Fellow in the Global Economy and Development program at the Brookings Institution
- Carla Dickstein, Senior Vice President for Research and Policy Development at the Coastal Enterprise Institute
- Martha Searchfield, Executive Director of the Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce.
Key Topics:
- What are the dimensions of legal and illegal immigration?
- What has been the net effect of immigration on the U.S. economy?
- What are the recent changes in federal policy, and what are the likely impacts of these changes?
- What has been the net effect of immigration on Maine? How are the recent trends affecting Maine?
- What do we expect for the months ahead?
- What would be a "strong" immigration policy from Maine's perspective?
- What do voters need to know?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
- Immigrants' Contribution to Maine's Workforce and C Economy, from the Coastal Enterprise Institute
- Building Maine's Economy: How Maine Can Embrace Immigrants and Strengthen the Workforce, more from CEI, 2016.
- 100 Years Ago, Maine's Economy Was Powered by Immigrants reporting in the Bangor Daily News, September, 2017.
- The Trump administration failed to study immigration vetting. So I did. David Bier from the Cato Institute in the Washington Post
- Migrants and refugees: The unlikely key for economic development, Dany Bahar for Brookings.
April 2018: Ranked Choice Voting: How Will It Work in Maine?
Nobody will ever deprive the American people of the right to vote except the American people themselves--and the only way they could do that is by not voting at all. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt
We'll talk about how ranked choice voting is moving forward for the June primary, what the Secretary of State is planning, and what voters need to know as they head for the polls. We'll take listener calls during the second half of the show.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- John Brautigam, a public interest attorney, senior adviser and strategist to Democracy Partnership's project, Maine Uses Ranked Choice Voting..
Grace Ramsey, deputy outreach director for FairVote, a national electoral reform advocacy group.
Key Topics:
- Is ranked choice voting definitely on for the June primary?
- What happened in court last week?
- How is RCV going to work locally?
- How is the RCV count going to be done by the State?
- What does RCV mean for the candidates?
- What do voters need to know as they cast their ranked ballots?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
March 2018 -- Gerrymandering: What's the Big Deal?
I could have been running against a saltshaker and I would have lost. --David Kessler, former Pennsylvania Congressman on the effects of gerrymandering.
We'll talk about how redistricting has changed over the last 50 years, the emergence of extreme partisan gerrymandering, court cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, and why it matters in Maine. We'll take listener calls in the second half hour.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Matt Dube, Assistant Professor in Computer Information Systems at the University of Maine-Augusta.
- Elaine Kamarck, Senior Fellow in the Governance Studies program and Director of the Center for Effective Public Management at the Brookings Institution, and Adjunct Lecturer in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School.
Key Topics:
- How has redistricting changed over the last 50 years?
- How can we tell if a state has engaged in extreme partisan gerrymandering?
- How can we tell if districts have been fairly drawn?
- What are the essential arguments in the court cases being argued at the Supreme Court?
- What are the remedies to counter extreme gerrymandering?
- Why should we care about gerrymandering here in Maine?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
- Gerrymandering and how to fix it, from Elaine Kamarck at Brookings.
- The new front in the gerrymandering wars, from the New York Times Magazine, August, 2017.
- We Drew 2,568 Congressional Districts By Hand. Here's How., from the 538 Gerrymandering Project, January 25, 2018.
- Mathematical Characteristics of District Boundary Lines as Indicators of Partisan Gerrymandering in U.S. House Elections, Richard J. Powell, Matthew P. Dube, and Jesse T. Clark, April, 2017.
- Assessing the Causes of District Homogeneity in U.S. House Elections, Richard J. Powell, Matthew P. Dube, and Jesse T. Clark, August, 2017
February 2018 -- Primary Elections: What Are They Good For?
We'll talk about how primaries have changed over the last 50 years, whether they're still working for the parties and the voters, what changes are on the horizon in Maine. We'll take listener calls in the second half hour.
In case you missed it live, you can listen to this show from the archive at weru.org.
Special Guests:
- Jill Goldthwait, former Maine State Senator and award-winning political columnist for the Ellsworth American and the Mount Desert Islander.
- Kevin Raye, former President of the Maine State Senate, former Chief of Staff to U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe, currently owner/operator of Raye's Mustard.
- Dan Shea, Professor of Government at Colby College.
Key Topics:
- How have primaries changed over the last 50 years?
- Are primaries working for the parties? For the voters?
- Are primaries a good way to choose the best-qualified candidates?
- What are the advantages and limitations of caucus vs. primary?
- What are the advantages and drawbacks of open vs. closed primaries?
- What other models are there to consider?
- What changes are on the horizon in Maine?
To learn more, follow these links to related articles and essays:
- Everything You Need to Know About Maine's Caucus System, League blog post from February 2016.
- Maine considers switching from caucuses to primaries, from the AP, March, 2016.
- How activists choose our politicians, long before we vote, Jonathan Rauch for the Brookings Institution, December, 2017.